More on the Architect role and title#

As a response to my thinking about the role of the Technical Solutions Architect, Hans Verbeeck makes a good point on his blog on the snobism of Architecture:

It's like everyone needs to be one. Especially the top developers seem to be targeted. If you are a lead developer then you stand a big chance of being labeled an Aspiring Architect by some folks within Microsoft. IMHO, you don't need to be an architect to be architecting. I would even say that probably most of the good architectural work comes from Lead Developers who have a deep deep udnerstanding of what software is all about.

The architect title is perhaps so over-used that it's lost its meaning, and I think that's the source of a lot of confusion and opportunism. I've always had a bit of a love/hate relationship with the architect title, but I guess people (including me) need some way of categorizing their qualifications in a name that's well understood.

Clearly, there's something very different about what guys like Don Box and Chris Anderson do with internal frameworks such as WCF and WPF, and what I do as an external consultant on enterprise (business) frameworks. But within the boundaries of terminology that's out there, I positioned myself somewhere in the triangle.

I actually like Hans' image a lot about being positioned outside the triangle - which also puts me more outside the business domain:

So this certainly makes sense to me.

About the snobism and whether or not you should wear the architect title: I forgot about it until now but I think the solution already exists: the Microsoft Certified Architect Program should be - or become, as it's still in its early stages - the governing instance that hands out the "architect" credentials (in the Microsoft-space anyway). While a regular Microsoft certification - in my opinion - doesn't say that much about the real-life experience or qualifications of someone, this architecture certification is backed by a Review Board and a pretty heavy qualification process. This should make the certification much more credible...

But in the end, I think you'll always have to prove your worth on the dance-floor, if you know what I mean. So I'll just keep doing my moves and let's keep this party rolling :-)

Wednesday, May 31, 2006 11:58:26 PM (Romance Standard Time, UTC+01:00)
There is indeed a lot of discussions, confusion and commotion about the semantics of "Architect" and what bothers me the most is that Microsoft has the "answer" with their "Microsoft Certified Architect Program".
Comments are closed.
All content © 2012, Jelle Druyts
On this page

Recent Photos
www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from Jelle Druyts. Make your own badge here.
Advertising
Top Picks
Statistics
Total Posts: 350
This Year: 0
This Month: 0
This Week: 0
Comments: 530
Archives
Sitemap
Disclaimer
This is my personal website, not my boss', not my mother's, and certainly not the pope's. My personal opinions may be irrelevant, inaccurate, boring or even plain wrong, I'm sorry if that makes you feel uncomfortable. But then again, you don't have to read them, I just hope you'll find something interesting here now and then. I'll certainly do my best. But if you don't like it, go read the pope's blog. I'm sure it's fascinating.

Powered by:
newtelligence dasBlog 2.0.7226.0

Sign In